If you weren’t privy to the war against good music that American evangelical Christians waged in the late 90’s, be grateful. One of the bands that many missed out on was The Squirrel Nut Zippers. I’ve recently rediscovered their music, and I must say that it is excellent. If you’ve got any love at all for Dixieland jazz or hillbilly swing, check them out.
I have a lot of time to read at work. 11 hours on weekdays. I’ve got my books and an endless supply of articles on the internet to peruse. Given my intrigue with philosophy, I like reading articles concerning value-theory (ethics and aesthetics) and also arguments for and against the existence of God. I picked up Mere Christianity by C. S. Lewis for the first time in a few years, and I’ve been poking through it, and I am enjoying it more than I did when I first read it a few years ago.
My enjoyment of Mere Christianity is part of my thought process here. I agree with a lot of what Lewis has to say in the book, mainly his argument of natural law and morality as leading to a belief in God. That argument doesn’t necessarily argue for a triune, all-knowing God who came to Earth as Jesus, but it is an argument for the existence of deity. Like I said, I agree with Lewis’ argument. I find myself putting the book down and thinking, How does anyone not believe an argument like this? That just seems silly, and intellectually dishonest.
I think that way because on this point of thought, ole Jack and I are in agreement. If we sat down over beers and a good pipe and discussed God’s existence, it could very well turn into a yes-fest. We would be the enlightened ones, and all those who disagreed with us would be poor ignorant wretches. It wouldn’t be intellectually honest at all, nor would it be fair to those who disagreed with us, but that sort of trap is easy to fall into.
Think about how many times you and a friend or two have solved all the world’s problems in a conversation. Wouldn’t everything be better if you recorded those conversations and handed them out to every person on the street? No, because though those conversations are enjoyable and often build closer relationships with friends, they often lack self-examination.
When Socrates debated with others in ancient Athens, his method was quite annoying to others. He would relentlessly scrutinize the position of those he debated. I try to apply this same principle to my own thoughts and beliefs. I feel like this is wise because I am a Christian, and I don’t think much of what’s out in the public forum that passes for Christian thought has little to do with Jesus Christ. Jesus is an afterthought or footnote to a largely Republican agenda that says we need to stop abortion so that poor babies can starve to death in the slums because it’s their family’s own fault that they can’t get ahead in life, and no you can’t have any of my bread because I earned it, and if I plug my ears I can’t hear your stomach growling.
I have to be honest and say I don’t know everything. I have been wrong about things in the past, which is part of what led to all this thinking about what I think.
I’m avoiding yes-fests of all sorts, be they Christian, atheist, or political. Yeah, I’m really avoiding the political ones, which means I should probably change that radio preset on my car because 106.3 is no longer Charlie; it’s WORD. I was recently reading some book reviews because I was trying to decide which of the following books I wanted to read The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins, God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything by Christopher Hitchens, or The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, And The Future of Reason by Sam Harris. Unfortunately, a lot of the reviews only really said, “Christians are stupid. So are Muslims. They’re so dumb. I love this book.” It was almost like the flip side of the same coin I’ve encountered so many times when a youth minister skimmed a book about Creationism and decided he could prove God existed. I guess I’ll get around to reading all the above books.
In the spirit of self-examination, am I exempt from WASP status since my ancestors were Welsh and Scottish, and therefore Celtic?
Filed under: Christianity, Music, Philosophy | 2 Comments »

